MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Dane Sweeny [581st] vs Thomas Fancutt [821st] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Sweeny 1 - 1 Fancutt

They have played 4 sets in total, with Sweeny winning 2 and Fancutt winning 2. The last match between Sweeny and Fancutt was at the M15 Caloundra, 25-07-2022, Final, Hard with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Dane Sweeny 1
Thomas Fancutt 1
Sweeny vs Fancutt H2H Profile
Sweeny Stats Fancutt
59% (13-9) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
1 Head-to-Head 1
581 Ranking 821
194 Highest Rank 382
24 Age 30
R Plays R
7 Titles 2
55% (178-144) Career Total W/L 53% (235-210)
$346,065 Career Prize Money $0
1 Hard H2H 1

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Sweeny VS Fancutt H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
Dane Sweeny
Player
Thomas Fancutt
66% ( 42 of 64)
1st Serve %
55% ( 35 of 64)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
62% ( 26 of 42)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 21 of 35)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
38% ( 24 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 31 of 64)
71
Total Points Won
57
6-2 6-1
cross
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Dane Sweeny
58% ( 26 of 45)
1st Serve %
72% ( 28 of 39)
13
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
92% ( 24 of 26)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
53% ( 10 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 3 of 11)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 11 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 22 of 39)
56
Total Points Won
28

Sweeny VS Fancutt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Sweeny Vs Fancutt H2H Stats
Dane Sweeny Sweeny Stats Thomas Fancutt Fancutt
1 H2H Matches 1
2 Sets Won 2
15 Games Won 19
3 Aces (Total) 18
2 Total Double Faults 5
1:18:30 Average Match Time 1:18:30
68% (70/103) 1st Serve % 56% (61/109)
57% (40/70) 1st Serve Win % 74% (45/61)
52% (17/33) 2nd Serve Win % 46% (22/48)
33% (4/12) Break Points Won % (Total) 60% (6/10)
39% (42/109) Return Points Win % 45% (46/103)
50% (1/2) Best of 3 Sets Win % 50% (1/2)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (1/1)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (1/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Dane Sweeny vs Thomas Fancutt Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Sweeny 1 - 1 Fancutt

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sweeny has won 44.91% of points on their second serve, while Fancutt has won 49.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sweeny, in recent form, has won 46.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fancutt has won 36.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.05% and 28.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Sweeny has saved 56.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fancutt has saved 35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Sweeny has won 39.53% of matches played (W/L 17/ 26), with Fancutt winning 41.18% (W/L 7/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Sweeny has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 145/ 102), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
  • Player level: In the last year, Sweeny has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.74% of matches (W/L 5/ 18), where as Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.18% of matches (W/L 7/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sweeny winning 1 times and Fancutt being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sweeny winning 2 and Fancutt winning 2. The last match between Sweeny and Fancutt was at the M15 Caloundra, 25-07-2022, Final, Hard with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:30.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Sweeny and Fancutt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sweeny winning 0 times and Fancutt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sweeny winning 0, and Fancutt 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sweeny has played against opponents with an average rank of 354.72 while Fancutt has played against players with an average rank of 372.18.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sweeny has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fancutt has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Sweeny has converted 34.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fancutt has converted 23.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Dane Sweeny Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    F
    cross
    Blake Ellis
    Player
    Dane Sweeny
    54% ( 48 of 89)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 73 of 104)
    13
    Aces
    3
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    75% ( 36 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 47 of 73)
    51% ( 21 of 41)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 17 of 31)
    18% ( 2 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    36% ( 32 of 89)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 40 of 104)
    97
    Total Points Won
    96
    L
    2-6 6-3 7-6(4) H2H
    SF
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Jason Murray Kubler
    79% ( 60 of 76)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 58 of 98)
    6
    Aces
    20
    1
    Double Faults
    10
    82% ( 49 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    78% ( 45 of 58)
    69% ( 11 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 16 of 40)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    21% ( 16 of 76)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 37 of 98)
    97
    Total Points Won
    77
    W
    6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Omar Jasika
    68% ( 52 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 77 of 109)
    4
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    71% ( 37 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 44 of 77)
    44% ( 11 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 14 of 32)
    24% ( 6 of 25)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    38% ( 29 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 51 of 109)
    99
    Total Points Won
    87
    W
    6-0 4-6 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Ethan Cook
    74% ( 48 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 52 of 82)
    1
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 32 of 52)
    59% ( 10 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 13 of 30)
    24% ( 4 of 17)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    35% ( 23 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 37 of 82)
    79
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    7-5 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Matthew Hulme
    62% ( 48 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    54% ( 46 of 85)
    9
    Aces
    8
    5
    Double Faults
    4
    77% ( 37 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 35 of 46)
    59% ( 17 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    46% ( 18 of 39)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 2 of 6)
    30% ( 23 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 32 of 85)
    86
    Total Points Won
    76
    W
    3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Omar Jasika
    Player
    Dane Sweeny
    71% ( 52 of 73)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 53 of 89)
    0
    Aces
    9
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    63% ( 33 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 34 of 53)
    57% ( 12 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    47% ( 17 of 36)
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    38% ( 28 of 73)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 38 of 89)
    83
    Total Points Won
    79
    L
    7-6(7) 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Christian Langmo
    76% ( 60 of 79)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 44 of 59)
    9
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    77% ( 46 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 32 of 44)
    53% ( 10 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    60% ( 9 of 15)
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 8)
    29% ( 23 of 79)
    Rtn Points Won
    31% ( 18 of 59)
    74
    Total Points Won
    64
    W
    7-6(3) 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Thomas Braithwaite
    61% ( 63 of 103)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 65 of 87)
    6
    Aces
    5
    8
    Double Faults
    5
    70% ( 44 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 42 of 65)
    50% ( 20 of 40)
    2nd Serve Won
    59% ( 13 of 22)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    38% ( 39 of 103)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 32 of 87)
    96
    Total Points Won
    94
    W
    6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dane Sweeny
    Player
    Stefan Storch
    67% ( 43 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 54 of 85)
    3
    Aces
    6
    3
    Double Faults
    7
    72% ( 31 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 35 of 54)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 11 of 31)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    36% ( 23 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 39 of 85)
    80
    Total Points Won
    69
    W
    3-6 6-2 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Cruz Hewitt
    Player
    Dane Sweeny
    56% ( 57 of 101)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 47 of 82)
    7
    Aces
    2
    9
    Double Faults
    4
    61% ( 35 of 57)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 32 of 47)
    50% ( 22 of 44)
    2nd Serve Won
    40% ( 14 of 35)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    44% ( 44 of 101)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 36 of 82)
    93
    Total Points Won
    90
    L
    3-6 6-4 6-4 H2H

    Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Takuya Kumasaka
    Player
    Thomas Fancutt
    65% ( 52 of 80)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 45 of 78)
    3
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    6
    62% ( 32 of 52)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 32 of 45)
    68% ( 19 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 11 of 33)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    36% ( 29 of 80)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 35 of 78)
    86
    Total Points Won
    72
    L
    7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Masamichi Imamura
    Player
    Thomas Fancutt
    77% ( 34 of 44)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    4
    Aces
    5
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    76% ( 26 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 16 of 32)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    63% ( 10 of 16)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    27% ( 12 of 44)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 22 of 48)
    54
    Total Points Won
    38
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Thomas Fancutt
    Player
    Edward Winter
    63% ( 48 of 76)
    1st Serve %
    68% ( 50 of 73)
    12
    Aces
    4
    4
    Double Faults
    1
    73% ( 35 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 32 of 50)
    61% ( 17 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 13 of 23)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    32% ( 24 of 76)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 28 of 73)
    80
    Total Points Won
    69
    W
    7-5 7-6(2) H2H
    QF
    cross
    Colin Sinclair
    Player
    Thomas Fancutt
    59% ( 36 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    49% ( 34 of 69)
    5
    Aces
    8
    1
    Double Faults
    3
    78% ( 28 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 24 of 34)
    64% ( 16 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    54% ( 19 of 35)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    28% ( 17 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 26 of 69)
    70
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    7-6(5) 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Thomas Fancutt
    Player
    Thijmen Loof
    65% ( 53 of 81)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 58 of 90)
    9
    Aces
    6
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    79% ( 42 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    74% ( 43 of 58)
    57% ( 16 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 16 of 32)
    25% ( 2 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    28% ( 23 of 81)
    Rtn Points Won
    34% ( 31 of 90)
    89
    Total Points Won
    82
    W
    6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Mackenzie Mcdonald
    Player
    Thomas Fancutt
    57% ( 62 of 109)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 60 of 106)
    11
    Aces
    16
    4
    Double Faults
    8
    77% ( 48 of 62)
    1st Serve Won
    78% ( 47 of 60)
    57% ( 27 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 19 of 46)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    31% ( 34 of 109)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 40 of 106)
    115
    Total Points Won
    100
    L
    7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Thomas Fancutt
    Player
    Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
    67% ( 32 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 33 of 53)
    6
    Aces
    6
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    75% ( 24 of 32)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 22 of 33)
    69% ( 11 of 16)
    2nd Serve Won
    30% ( 6 of 20)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    27% ( 13 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 25 of 53)
    60
    Total Points Won
    41
    W
    6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Thomas Fancutt
    Player
    Hanyi Liu
    69% ( 43 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    51% ( 33 of 65)
    8
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    77% ( 33 of 43)
    1st Serve Won
    73% ( 24 of 33)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 17 of 32)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    26% ( 16 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 24 of 65)
    70
    Total Points Won
    57
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Yusuke Takahashi
    Player
    Thomas Fancutt
    64% ( 49 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 58 of 93)
    5
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    82% ( 40 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 41 of 58)
    57% ( 16 of 28)
    2nd Serve Won
    49% ( 17 of 35)
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    27% ( 21 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    38% ( 35 of 93)
    91
    Total Points Won
    79
    L
    7-6(4) 7-5 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Yurii Dzhavakian
    Player
    Thomas Fancutt
    55% ( 58 of 105)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 40 of 64)
    4
    Aces
    4
    8
    Double Faults
    4
    67% ( 39 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 24 of 40)
    45% ( 21 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    43% ( 45 of 105)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 31 of 64)
    91
    Total Points Won
    78
    L
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Sweeny & Fancutt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Dane Sweeny Sweeny Stats Thomas Fancutt Fancutt
    55% (178/144) Win/Loss 53% (235/210)
    53% (398/359) Sets Win/Loss 52% (519/478)
    51% (3661/3481) Games Win/Loss 51% (4856/4652)
    0.2 Aces Per Game 0.59
    693 Aces Total 2719
    0.29 Double Faults Per Game 0.29
    1012 Total Double Faults 1348
    1:38:51 Average Match Time 1:23:6
    417.3 Average Opponent Rank 481.49
    63% (13301/21207) 1st Serve % 58% (14985/25693)
    65% (8712/13301) 1st Serve Win % 74% (11041/14985)
    51% (4007/7906) 2nd Serve Win % 49% (5273/10708)
    43% (930/2161) Break Points Won % (Total) 41% (911/2221)
    41% (8441/20820) Return Points Win % 37% (9553/25783)
    55% (175/318) Best of 3 Sets Win % 54% (232/431)
    67% (2/3) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/2)
    49% (41/84) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 40% (63/159)
    62% (68/110) Deciding Set Win % 57% (67/117)
    88% (155/136) 1st Set Won, Won Match 84% (240/202)
    12% (155/19) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 16% (240/38)
    25% (167/42) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 16% (205/33)

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...